Gopal borrows Rs. from Ankit at annual interest. He then adds Rs. of his own money and lends Rs. to Ishan at annual interest. At the end of the year, after returning Ankit's dues, the net interest retained by Gopal is the same as that accrued to Ankit. On the other hand, had Gopal lent Rs. to Ishan at , then the net interest retained by him would have increased by Rs. . If all interests are compounded annually, then find the value of .
Gopal borrows Rs. from Ankit at annual interest. He then adds Rs. of his own money and lends Rs. to Ishan at annual interest. At the end of the year, after returning Ankit's dues, the net interest retained by Gopal is the same as that accrued to Ankit. On the other hand, had Gopal lent Rs. to Ishan at , then the net interest retained by him would have increased by Rs. . If all interests are compounded annually, then find the value of .
Entered answer:
Solution
Gopal is essentially acting as a "middleman" in this lending scenario:
He borrows Rs. X from Ankit at 8% annual interest
He lends Rs. (X + Y) to Ishan at 10% annual interest
His profit = Interest received from Ishan - Interest paid to Ankit
Since we're dealing with one year, compound interest = simple interest
Interest Gopal owes to Ankit:
Amount borrowed = Rs. X
Interest rate = 8% per annum
Interest owed =
Case I: When Gopal lends (X + Y) to Ishan
Amount lent = Rs. (X + Y)
Interest rate = 10% per annum
Interest received =
Net interest retained by Gopal:
Net Interest = Interest Received - Interest Paid
Net Interest =
The problem states: "The net interest retained by Gopal equals the interest accrued to Ankit"
This means:
Key insight: Y is 60% of X
Case II: When Gopal lends (X + 2Y) to Ishan
Interest received =
Net interest =
The problem states: "Net interest would increase by Rs. 150"
This means:
Since and :
Therefore:
X = Rs. 2500
Y = Rs. 1500
X + Y = Rs. 4000
Answer: X + Y = Rs. 4000