CAT: Logical ReasoningGames & Tournaments. Free, no login required.

At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu.

At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3.

The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.

1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu:

• Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2.

• Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.

At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu.

At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3.

The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.

1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu:

• Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2.

• Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.

At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu.

At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3.

The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.

1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu:

• Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2.

• Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.

At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu.

At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3.

The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.

1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu:

• Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2.

• Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.

At InnovateX, six employees, Asha, Bunty, Chintu, Dolly, Eklavya, and Falguni, were split into two groups of three each: Elite led by Manager Kuku, and Novice led by Manager Lalu.

At the end of each quarter, Kuku and Lalu handed out ratings to all members in their respective groups. In each group, each employee received a distinct integer rating from 1 to 3.

The score for an employee at the end of a quarter is defined as their cumulative rating from the beginning of the year. At the end of each quarter the employee in Novice with the highest score was promoted to Elite, and the employee in Elite with the minimum score was demoted to Novice. If there was a tie in scores, the employee with a higher rating in the latest quarter was ranked higher.

1. Asha, Bunty, and Chintu were in Elite at the beginning of Quarter 1. All of them were in Novice at the beginning of Quarter 4.
2. Dolly and Falguni were the only employees who got the same rating across all the quarters.
3. The following is known about ratings given by Lalu:

• Bunty received a rating of 1 in Quarter 2.

• Asha and Dolly received ratings of 1 and 2, respectively, in Quarter 3.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

Pulak, Qasim, Ritesh, and Suresh participated in a tournament comprising of eight rounds. In each round, they formed two pairs, with each of them being in exactly one pair. The only restriction in the pairing was that the pairs would change in successive rounds. For example, if Pulak formed a pair with Qasim in the first round, then he would have to form a pair with Ritesh or Suresh in the second round. He would be free to pair with Qasim again in the third round. In each round, each pair decided whether to play the game in that round or not. If they decided not to play, then no money was exchanged between them. If they decided to play, they had to bet either Rs.1 or Rs.2 in that round. For example, if they chose to bet Rs.2, then the player winning the game got Rs.2 from the one losing the game.

At the beginning of the tournament, the players had Rs.10 each. The following table shows partial information about the amounts that the players had at the end of each of the eight rounds. It shows every time a player had Rs.10 at the end of a round, as well as every time, at the end of a round, a player had either the minimum or the maximum amount that he would have had across the eight rounds. For example, Suresh had Rs.10 at the end of Rounds 1, 3, and 8 and not after any of the other rounds. The maximum amount that he had at the end of any round was Rs.13 (at the end of Round 5), and the minimum amount he had at the end of any round was Rs.8 (at the end of Round 2). At the end of all other rounds, he must have had either Rs.9, Rs.11, or Rs.12.

It was also known that Pulak and Qasim had the same amount of money with them at the end of Round 4.

Pulak, Qasim, Ritesh, and Suresh participated in a tournament comprising of eight rounds. In each round, they formed two pairs, with each of them being in exactly one pair. The only restriction in the pairing was that the pairs would change in successive rounds. For example, if Pulak formed a pair with Qasim in the first round, then he would have to form a pair with Ritesh or Suresh in the second round. He would be free to pair with Qasim again in the third round. In each round, each pair decided whether to play the game in that round or not. If they decided not to play, then no money was exchanged between them. If they decided to play, they had to bet either Rs.1 or Rs.2 in that round. For example, if they chose to bet Rs.2, then the player winning the game got Rs.2 from the one losing the game.

At the beginning of the tournament, the players had Rs.10 each. The following table shows partial information about the amounts that the players had at the end of each of the eight rounds. It shows every time a player had Rs.10 at the end of a round, as well as every time, at the end of a round, a player had either the minimum or the maximum amount that he would have had across the eight rounds. For example, Suresh had Rs.10 at the end of Rounds 1, 3, and 8 and not after any of the other rounds. The maximum amount that he had at the end of any round was Rs.13 (at the end of Round 5), and the minimum amount he had at the end of any round was Rs.8 (at the end of Round 2). At the end of all other rounds, he must have had either Rs.9, Rs.11, or Rs.12.

It was also known that Pulak and Qasim had the same amount of money with them at the end of Round 4.

Pulak, Qasim, Ritesh, and Suresh participated in a tournament comprising of eight rounds. In each round, they formed two pairs, with each of them being in exactly one pair. The only restriction in the pairing was that the pairs would change in successive rounds. For example, if Pulak formed a pair with Qasim in the first round, then he would have to form a pair with Ritesh or Suresh in the second round. He would be free to pair with Qasim again in the third round. In each round, each pair decided whether to play the game in that round or not. If they decided not to play, then no money was exchanged between them. If they decided to play, they had to bet either Rs.1 or Rs.2 in that round. For example, if they chose to bet Rs.2, then the player winning the game got Rs.2 from the one losing the game.

At the beginning of the tournament, the players had Rs.10 each. The following table shows partial information about the amounts that the players had at the end of each of the eight rounds. It shows every time a player had Rs.10 at the end of a round, as well as every time, at the end of a round, a player had either the minimum or the maximum amount that he would have had across the eight rounds. For example, Suresh had Rs.10 at the end of Rounds 1, 3, and 8 and not after any of the other rounds. The maximum amount that he had at the end of any round was Rs.13 (at the end of Round 5), and the minimum amount he had at the end of any round was Rs.8 (at the end of Round 2). At the end of all other rounds, he must have had either Rs.9, Rs.11, or Rs.12.

It was also known that Pulak and Qasim had the same amount of money with them at the end of Round 4.

Pulak, Qasim, Ritesh, and Suresh participated in a tournament comprising of eight rounds. In each round, they formed two pairs, with each of them being in exactly one pair. The only restriction in the pairing was that the pairs would change in successive rounds. For example, if Pulak formed a pair with Qasim in the first round, then he would have to form a pair with Ritesh or Suresh in the second round. He would be free to pair with Qasim again in the third round. In each round, each pair decided whether to play the game in that round or not. If they decided not to play, then no money was exchanged between them. If they decided to play, they had to bet either Rs.1 or Rs.2 in that round. For example, if they chose to bet Rs.2, then the player winning the game got Rs.2 from the one losing the game.

At the beginning of the tournament, the players had Rs.10 each. The following table shows partial information about the amounts that the players had at the end of each of the eight rounds. It shows every time a player had Rs.10 at the end of a round, as well as every time, at the end of a round, a player had either the minimum or the maximum amount that he would have had across the eight rounds. For example, Suresh had Rs.10 at the end of Rounds 1, 3, and 8 and not after any of the other rounds. The maximum amount that he had at the end of any round was Rs.13 (at the end of Round 5), and the minimum amount he had at the end of any round was Rs.8 (at the end of Round 2). At the end of all other rounds, he must have had either Rs.9, Rs.11, or Rs.12.

It was also known that Pulak and Qasim had the same amount of money with them at the end of Round 4.

Pulak, Qasim, Ritesh, and Suresh participated in a tournament comprising of eight rounds. In each round, they formed two pairs, with each of them being in exactly one pair. The only restriction in the pairing was that the pairs would change in successive rounds. For example, if Pulak formed a pair with Qasim in the first round, then he would have to form a pair with Ritesh or Suresh in the second round. He would be free to pair with Qasim again in the third round. In each round, each pair decided whether to play the game in that round or not. If they decided not to play, then no money was exchanged between them. If they decided to play, they had to bet either Rs.1 or Rs.2 in that round. For example, if they chose to bet Rs.2, then the player winning the game got Rs.2 from the one losing the game.

At the beginning of the tournament, the players had Rs.10 each. The following table shows partial information about the amounts that the players had at the end of each of the eight rounds. It shows every time a player had Rs.10 at the end of a round, as well as every time, at the end of a round, a player had either the minimum or the maximum amount that he would have had across the eight rounds. For example, Suresh had Rs.10 at the end of Rounds 1, 3, and 8 and not after any of the other rounds. The maximum amount that he had at the end of any round was Rs.13 (at the end of Round 5), and the minimum amount he had at the end of any round was Rs.8 (at the end of Round 2). At the end of all other rounds, he must have had either Rs.9, Rs.11, or Rs.12.

It was also known that Pulak and Qasim had the same amount of money with them at the end of Round 4.

The game of Chango is a game where two people play against each other; one of them wins and the other loses, i.e., there are no drawn Chango games. 12 players participated in a Chango championship. They were divided into four groups: Group A consisted of Aruna, Azul, and Arif; Group B consisted of Brinda, Brij, and Biju; Group C consisted of Chitra, Chetan, and Chhavi; and Group D consisted of Dipen, Donna, and Deb.

Players within each group had a distinct rank going into the championship. The players have NOT been listed necessarily according to their ranks. In the group stage of the game, the second and third ranked players play against each other, and the winner of that game plays against the first ranked player of the group. The winner of this second game is considered as the winner of the group and enters a semi-final.

The winners from Groups A and B play against each other in one semi-final, while the winners from Groups C and D play against each other in the other semi-final. The winners of the two semi-finals play against each other in the final to decide the winner of the championship.

It is known that:

1. Chitra did not win the championship.

2. Aruna did not play against Arif. Brij did not play against Brinda.

3. Aruna, Biju, Chitra, and Dipen played three games each, Azul and Chetan played two games each, and the remaining players played one game each.

The game of Chango is a game where two people play against each other; one of them wins and the other loses, i.e., there are no drawn Chango games. 12 players participated in a Chango championship. They were divided into four groups: Group A consisted of Aruna, Azul, and Arif; Group B consisted of Brinda, Brij, and Biju; Group C consisted of Chitra, Chetan, and Chhavi; and Group D consisted of Dipen, Donna, and Deb.

Players within each group had a distinct rank going into the championship. The players have NOT been listed necessarily according to their ranks. In the group stage of the game, the second and third ranked players play against each other, and the winner of that game plays against the first ranked player of the group. The winner of this second game is considered as the winner of the group and enters a semi-final.

The winners from Groups A and B play against each other in one semi-final, while the winners from Groups C and D play against each other in the other semi-final. The winners of the two semi-finals play against each other in the final to decide the winner of the championship.

It is known that:

1. Chitra did not win the championship.

2. Aruna did not play against Arif. Brij did not play against Brinda.

3. Aruna, Biju, Chitra, and Dipen played three games each, Azul and Chetan played two games each, and the remaining players played one game each.

The game of Chango is a game where two people play against each other; one of them wins and the other loses, i.e., there are no drawn Chango games. 12 players participated in a Chango championship. They were divided into four groups: Group A consisted of Aruna, Azul, and Arif; Group B consisted of Brinda, Brij, and Biju; Group C consisted of Chitra, Chetan, and Chhavi; and Group D consisted of Dipen, Donna, and Deb.

Players within each group had a distinct rank going into the championship. The players have NOT been listed necessarily according to their ranks. In the group stage of the game, the second and third ranked players play against each other, and the winner of that game plays against the first ranked player of the group. The winner of this second game is considered as the winner of the group and enters a semi-final.

The winners from Groups A and B play against each other in one semi-final, while the winners from Groups C and D play against each other in the other semi-final. The winners of the two semi-finals play against each other in the final to decide the winner of the championship.

It is known that:

1. Chitra did not win the championship.

2. Aruna did not play against Arif. Brij did not play against Brinda.

3. Aruna, Biju, Chitra, and Dipen played three games each, Azul and Chetan played two games each, and the remaining players played one game each.

The game of Chango is a game where two people play against each other; one of them wins and the other loses, i.e., there are no drawn Chango games. 12 players participated in a Chango championship. They were divided into four groups: Group A consisted of Aruna, Azul, and Arif; Group B consisted of Brinda, Brij, and Biju; Group C consisted of Chitra, Chetan, and Chhavi; and Group D consisted of Dipen, Donna, and Deb.

Players within each group had a distinct rank going into the championship. The players have NOT been listed necessarily according to their ranks. In the group stage of the game, the second and third ranked players play against each other, and the winner of that game plays against the first ranked player of the group. The winner of this second game is considered as the winner of the group and enters a semi-final.

The winners from Groups A and B play against each other in one semi-final, while the winners from Groups C and D play against each other in the other semi-final. The winners of the two semi-finals play against each other in the final to decide the winner of the championship.

It is known that:

1. Chitra did not win the championship.

2. Aruna did not play against Arif. Brij did not play against Brinda.

3. Aruna, Biju, Chitra, and Dipen played three games each, Azul and Chetan played two games each, and the remaining players played one game each.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ravi works in an online food-delivery company. After each delivery, customers rate Ravi on each of four parameters Behaviour, Packaging, Hygiene, and Timeliness, on a scale from $1$ to 9. If the total of the four rating points is $25$ or more, then Ravi gets a bonus of Rs. $20$ for that delivery. Additionally, a customer may or may not give Ravi a tip. If the customer gives a tip, it is either Rs. $30$ or Rs. $50$.

One day, Ravi made four deliveries - one to each of Atal, Bihari, Chirag and Deepak, and received a total of Rs. $120$ in bonus and tips. He did not get both a bonus and a tip from the same customer.

The following additional facts are also known.

1. In Timeliness, Ravi received a total of $21$ points, and three of the customers gave him the same rating points in this parameter. Atal gave higher rating points than Bihari and Chirag in this parameter.

2. Ravi received distinct rating points in Packaging from the four customers adding up to $29$ points. Similarly, Ravi received distinct rating points in Hygiene from the four customers adding up to $26$ points.

3. Chirag gave the same rating points for Packaging and Hygiene.

4. Among the four customers, Bihari gave the highest rating points in Packaging, and Chirag gave the highest rating points in Hygiene.

5. Everyone rated Ravi between $5$ and $7$ in Behaviour. Unique maximum and minimum ratings in this parameter were given by Atal and Deepak respectively.

6. If the customers are ranked based on ratings given by them in individual parameters, then Atal's rank based on Packaging is the same as that based on Hygiene. This is also true for Deepak.

Ten objects o1, o2, …, o10 were distributed among Amar, Barat, Charles, Disha, and Elise. Each item went to exactly one person. Each person got exactly two of the items, and this pair of objects is called her/his bundle.

The following table shows how each person values each object.

The value of any bundle by a person is the sum of that person's values of the objects in that bundle. A person X envies another person Y if X values Y 's bundle more than X 's own bundle.

For example, hypothetically suppose Amar's bundle consists of $01$ and $02$, and Barat's bundle consists of $03$ and $04$. Then Amar values his own bundle at $4+9=13$ and Barat's bundle at $9$

$+3=12$. Hence Amar does not envy Barat. On the other hand, Barat values his own bundle at $7+5=12$ and Amar's bundle at $5+9=14$. Hence Barat envies Amar.

The following facts are known about the actual distribution of the objects among the five people.

1. If someone's value for an object is $10$, then she/he received that object.
2. Objects o1, o2, and o3 were given to three different people.
3. Objects $01$ and $08$ were given to different people.
4. Three people value their own bundles at $16$. No one values her/his own bundle at a number higher than $16$.
5. Disha values her own bundle at an odd number. All others value their own bundles at an even number.
6. Some people who value their own bundles less than $16$ envy some other people who value their own bundle at $16$. No one else envies others.

Ten objects o1, o2, …, o10 were distributed among Amar, Barat, Charles, Disha, and Elise. Each item went to exactly one person. Each person got exactly two of the items, and this pair of objects is called her/his bundle.

The following table shows how each person values each object.

The value of any bundle by a person is the sum of that person's values of the objects in that bundle. A person X envies another person Y if X values Y 's bundle more than X 's own bundle.

For example, hypothetically suppose Amar's bundle consists of $01$ and $02$, and Barat's bundle consists of $03$ and $04$. Then Amar values his own bundle at $4+9=13$ and Barat's bundle at $9$

$+3=12$. Hence Amar does not envy Barat. On the other hand, Barat values his own bundle at $7+5=12$ and Amar's bundle at $5+9=14$. Hence Barat envies Amar.

The following facts are known about the actual distribution of the objects among the five people.

1. If someone's value for an object is $10$, then she/he received that object.
2. Objects o1, o2, and o3 were given to three different people.
3. Objects $01$ and $08$ were given to different people.
4. Three people value their own bundles at $16$. No one values her/his own bundle at a number higher than $16$.
5. Disha values her own bundle at an odd number. All others value their own bundles at an even number.
6. Some people who value their own bundles less than $16$ envy some other people who value their own bundle at $16$. No one else envies others.

Ten objects o1, o2, …, o10 were distributed among Amar, Barat, Charles, Disha, and Elise. Each item went to exactly one person. Each person got exactly two of the items, and this pair of objects is called her/his bundle.

The following table shows how each person values each object.

The value of any bundle by a person is the sum of that person's values of the objects in that bundle. A person X envies another person Y if X values Y 's bundle more than X 's own bundle.

For example, hypothetically suppose Amar's bundle consists of $01$ and $02$, and Barat's bundle consists of $03$ and $04$. Then Amar values his own bundle at $4+9=13$ and Barat's bundle at $9$

$+3=12$. Hence Amar does not envy Barat. On the other hand, Barat values his own bundle at $7+5=12$ and Amar's bundle at $5+9=14$. Hence Barat envies Amar.

The following facts are known about the actual distribution of the objects among the five people.

1. If someone's value for an object is $10$, then she/he received that object.
2. Objects o1, o2, and o3 were given to three different people.
3. Objects $01$ and $08$ were given to different people.
4. Three people value their own bundles at $16$. No one values her/his own bundle at a number higher than $16$.
5. Disha values her own bundle at an odd number. All others value their own bundles at an even number.
6. Some people who value their own bundles less than $16$ envy some other people who value their own bundle at $16$. No one else envies others.

Ten objects o1, o2, …, o10 were distributed among Amar, Barat, Charles, Disha, and Elise. Each item went to exactly one person. Each person got exactly two of the items, and this pair of objects is called her/his bundle.

The following table shows how each person values each object.

The value of any bundle by a person is the sum of that person's values of the objects in that bundle. A person X envies another person Y if X values Y 's bundle more than X 's own bundle.

For example, hypothetically suppose Amar's bundle consists of $01$ and $02$, and Barat's bundle consists of $03$ and $04$. Then Amar values his own bundle at $4+9=13$ and Barat's bundle at $9$

$+3=12$. Hence Amar does not envy Barat. On the other hand, Barat values his own bundle at $7+5=12$ and Amar's bundle at $5+9=14$. Hence Barat envies Amar.

The following facts are known about the actual distribution of the objects among the five people.

1. If someone's value for an object is $10$, then she/he received that object.
2. Objects o1, o2, and o3 were given to three different people.
3. Objects $01$ and $08$ were given to different people.
4. Three people value their own bundles at $16$. No one values her/his own bundle at a number higher than $16$.
5. Disha values her own bundle at an odd number. All others value their own bundles at an even number.
6. Some people who value their own bundles less than $16$ envy some other people who value their own bundle at $16$. No one else envies others.

Ten objects o1, o2, …, o10 were distributed among Amar, Barat, Charles, Disha, and Elise. Each item went to exactly one person. Each person got exactly two of the items, and this pair of objects is called her/his bundle.

The following table shows how each person values each object.

The value of any bundle by a person is the sum of that person's values of the objects in that bundle. A person X envies another person Y if X values Y 's bundle more than X 's own bundle.

For example, hypothetically suppose Amar's bundle consists of $01$ and $02$, and Barat's bundle consists of $03$ and $04$. Then Amar values his own bundle at $4+9=13$ and Barat's bundle at $9$

$+3=12$. Hence Amar does not envy Barat. On the other hand, Barat values his own bundle at $7+5=12$ and Amar's bundle at $5+9=14$. Hence Barat envies Amar.

The following facts are known about the actual distribution of the objects among the five people.

1. If someone's value for an object is $10$, then she/he received that object.
2. Objects o1, o2, and o3 were given to three different people.
3. Objects $01$ and $08$ were given to different people.
4. Three people value their own bundles at $16$. No one values her/his own bundle at a number higher than $16$.
5. Disha values her own bundle at an odd number. All others value their own bundles at an even number.
6. Some people who value their own bundles less than $16$ envy some other people who value their own bundle at $16$. No one else envies others.