The question asks what the author would be LEAST likely to support. This means we need to find the option that either contradicts the passage or isn't supported by any evidence in the text.

Step 1: Look for direct evidence The passage gives us clear examples of the author's views. When the author shares personal experiences and makes conclusions, those show what they support. Step 2: Check each option against the text We need to see which options have clear support in the passage and which one doesn't. From passage: "I have been offered tea at a British garden party, a Bedouin campfire, a Turkish carpet shop and a Japanese chashitsu... In each case the offering was more an idea – friendship, community, respect - than a drink" This shows the author believes tea creates social connections worldwide -> supports options about social rituals and friendship. From passage: "During the Second World War, tea service was presented as a social and patriotic activity that uplifted soldiers and calmed refugees" This directly supports the idea that tea was promoted for patriotic reasons.

🟢 Option 1 -> supported -> Author gives examples from British, Bedouin, Turkish, and Japanese settings, showing tea as a worldwide social ritual 🟢 Option 2 -> supported -> Author says tea offerings create "friendship, community, respect" and promote "human dialogue and friendship" 🟢 Option 3 -> supported -> Passage directly states tea was "presented as a social and patriotic activity" during WWII 🔴 Option 4 -> no evidence -> Passage never mentions tea becoming the "leading drink" in Britain during the 19th century. Author discusses tea's evolution but doesn't make this specific claim about Britain or ranking it as #1 drink. The author would be LEAST likely to support Option 4 because there's simply no evidence for this claim in the passage.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts