Solution
We need to find what the passage suggests would be the opposite of fast fashion. Let us trace through the passage to see what solutions it offers.
The passage first explains fast fashion problems -> then explores second-hand shopping as a solution -> but warns about microfiber issues with older clothes -> then gives the key advice for what actually works.
From passage: "They would be well advised to buy high-quality items that shed less and last longer as this combats both microfibre pollution and excess garments ending up in landfills."
This sentence is the key - it directly tells us what the passage thinks is the real solution to fast fashion's problems.
The thought process: Fast fashion = cheap, disposable, wasteful -> So slow fashion = opposite = high quality, durable, long-lasting
š Option 1 -> overstates -> says clothes "do not shed" microfibres, but passage only says high-quality items shed "less," not zero
š Option 2 -> partial-truth -> mentions one problem (toxins/dyes) but misses the main solution the passage focuses on (durability and quality)
š Option 3 -> scope-error -> passage mentions vintage stores but doesn't say being sold by them defines what makes clothes better - focuses on the quality of items, not where they're sold
š¢ Option 4 -> correct -> directly matches the passage's advice: "high-quality items that... last longer" - captures both the quality and durability aspects the passage emphasizes
The passage clearly states that buying high-quality, long-lasting items is the solution to fast fashion's environmental problems.