We need to find which statement goes against what the passage says or isn't mentioned at all. The key is to carefully check each option against the text.

First, let's identify what the passage says about recent studies on romanticism -> They acknowledge differences between national romanticisms but try to find common philosophical concerns. From passage: "Instead of overlooking the undeniable differences between the variety of romanticisms of different nations that Lovejoy had stressed, such studies attempt to characterize romanticism, not in terms of a single definition, a specific time, or a specific place, but in terms of 'particular philosophical questions and concerns'." The passage clearly states recent studies do NOT overlook differences -> they acknowledge them but look for shared philosophical themes.

🟢 Option 1 -> supported -> passage says characterizing romantic aesthetics is "neither impossible nor undesirable" 🟢 Option 2 -> supported -> passage mentions romantics' views are "found not in developed theoretical accounts, but in fragments, aphorisms and poems" 🔴 Option 3 -> contradicts passage -> says recent studies "seek to refute differences" but passage says they acknowledge differences while finding common concerns 🟢 Option 4 -> supported -> passage states "many of the romantics rejected the identification of aesthetics with a circumscribed domain of human life that is separated from practical and theoretical domains" The confusion students might have is between options 1 and 3. Option 1 seems obvious since the passage discusses challenges, but it clearly states the task is still possible and desirable. Option 3 is trickier because it sounds like what recent studies might do, but the passage specifically says they don't overlook differences - they work with them.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts