Skip to main contentSkip to solution

In the late 1960s, while studying the northern-elephant-seal population along the coasts of Mexico and California, Burney Le Boeuf and his colleagues couldn't help but notice that the threat calls of males at some sites sounded different from those of males at other sites. That was the first time dialects were documented in a nonhuman mammal.

All the northern elephant seals that exist today are descendants of the small herd that survived on Isla Guadalupe after the near extinction of the species in the nineteenth century. As that tiny population grew, northern elephant seals started to recolonize former breeding locations. It was precisely on the more recently colonized islands where Le Boeuf found that the tempos of the male vocal displays showed stronger differences to the ones from Isla Guadalupe, the founder colony.

In order to test the reliability of these dialects over time, Le Boeuf and other researchers visited Año Nuevo Island in California - the island where males showed the slowest pulse rates in their calls every winter from 1968 to 1972. "What we found is that the pulse rate increased, but it still remained relatively slow compared to the other colonies we had measured in the past" Le Boeuf told me.

At the individual level, the pulse of the calls stayed the same: A male would maintain his vocal signature throughout his lifetime. But the average pulse rate was changing. Immigration could have been responsible for this increase, as in the early 1970s, 43 percent of the males on Año Nuevo had come from southern rookeries that had a faster pulse rate. This led Le Boeuf and his collaborator, Lewis Petrinovich, to deduce that the dialects were, perhaps, a result of isolation over time, after the breeding sites had been recolonized. For instance, the first settlers of Año Nuevo could have had, by chance, calls with low pulse rates. At other sites, where the scientists found faster pulse rates, the opposite would have happened - seals with faster rates would have happened to arrive first.

As the population continued to expand and the islands kept on receiving immigrants from the original population, the calls in all locations would have eventually regressed to the average pulse rate of the founder colony. In the decades that followed, scientists noticed that the geographical variations reported in 1969 were not obvious anymore. In the early 2010s, while studying northern elephant seals on Año Nuevo Island, researcher Caroline Casey noticed, too, that what Le Boeuf had heard decades ago was not what she heard now. By performing more sophisticated statistical analyses on both sets of data, Casey and Le Boeuf confirmed that dialects existed back then but had vanished. Yet there are other differences between the males from the late 1960s and their great-great-grandsons: Modern males exhibit more individual diversity, and their calls are more complex. While 50 years ago the drumming pattern was quite simple and the dialects denoted just a change in tempo, Casey explained, the calls recorded today have more complex structures, sometimes featuring doublets or triplets.

Which one of the following best sums up the overall history of transformation of male northern elephant seal calls?

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1

The passage gives us a clear before-and-after picture.

From passage: "Modern males exhibit more individual diversity, and their calls are more complex. While 50 years ago the drumming pattern was quite simple and the dialects denoted just a change in tempo, Casey explained, the calls recorded today have more complex structures"

From passage: "In the decades that followed, scientists noticed that the geographical variations reported in 1969 were not obvious anymore"

The transformation path: Simple + Regional variety → Complex + Individual variety


Now let's check each option against this timeline:

🟢 Option 1 is correct → captures the complete transformation accurately

  • Gets all three changes right: simple→complex, less individual→more individual, great regional→less regional

🔴 Option 2 → direction-error → says calls got simpler when they got more complex

  • Completely backwards on complexity trend

🟠 Option 3 → partial-truth → right about complexity but wrong about individual variety

  • Says individual variety stayed low when passage clearly states it increased

🔴 Option 4 → scope-error → too narrow, misses the big picture

  • Only talks about pulse rates matching founder colony, ignores complexity and individual diversity changes entirely

The key insight: Option 1 captures all three dimensions of change (composition, individual variety, regional variety) while others miss at least one major transformation.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question