CATVA > MediumEntered answer:✅ Correct Answer: 3124Related questions:CAT 2019 Slot 2The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer. Such a belief in the harmony of nature requires a purpose presumably imposed by the goodness and wisdom of a deity. These parts, all fit together into an integrated, well-ordered system that was created by design. Historically, the notion of a balance of nature is part observational, part metaphysical, and not scientific in any way. It is an example of an ancient belief system called teleology, the notion that what we call nature has a predetermined destiny associated with its component parts. CAT 2018 Slot 1The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer. Impartiality and objectivity are fiendishly difficult concepts that can cause all sorts of injustices even if transparently implemented. It encourages us into bubbles of people we know and like, while blinding us to different perspectives, but the deeper problem of 'transparency' lies in the words " and much more". Twitter's website says that "tweets you are likely to care about most will show up first in your timeline based on accounts you interact with most, tweets you engage with, and much more." We are only told some of the basic principles, and we can't see the algorithm itself, making it hard for citizens to analyse the system sensibly or fairly or be convinced of its impartiality and objectivity. CAT 2021 Slot 3The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer. It is regimes of truth that make certain relationships speak able - relationships, like subjectivities, are constituted through discursive formations, which sustain regimes of truth. Relationships are nothing without the communication that brings them into being; interpersonal communication is connected to knowledge shared by interlocutors, and scholars should attend to relational histories in their analyses. A Foucauldian approach to relationships goes beyond these conceptions of discourse and history to macro level regimes of truth as constituting relationships. Reconsidering micro practices within relationships that are constituted within and simultaneously contributors to regimes of truth acknowledges the central position of power/knowledge in the constitution of what has come to be considered true and real.