Solution
We need to find which statement, when made false, would support what the author believes.
Step 1: Find the author's key claims first -> Government was slow to act, there's a gap between finance world and public, we need collective action
Step 2: Test each option by making it false -> See which one strengthens author's argument
From passage: "though the sluggishness of the world's governments, in not preparing for the great unraveling of autumn 2008, was then and still is stupefying"
The author clearly criticizes governments for being slow and unprepared -> This shows he thinks the crisis WAS a failure of collective action.
š Option 1 -> If false: "Most people DO understand finance" -> This would weaken author's claim about the big gap between finance and public
š Option 2 -> If false: "Crisis lasted less than 2 years" -> Doesn't connect to author's main arguments about government failure or collective action
š Option 3 -> If false: "Science-arts gap hasn't narrowed" -> Author actually agrees the gap has narrowed, so making this false contradicts him
š¢ Option 4 -> If false: "The crisis WAS a failure of collective action" -> This directly supports author's criticism of government sluggishness and unpreparedness
Key insight: When we make Option 4 false, we get "The crisis WAS a failure of collective action" - which perfectly matches the author's complaint about government sluggishness.
More from this set:
Question 14
Question 17