Solution
We need to find what doesn't make octopuses different or "misfit" among their extended family of molluscs.
The key is understanding what makes something a "misfit" -> it has to be different from the group. So I'm looking for something that octopuses share with other molluscs or cephalopods.
From passage: "Octopuses are misfits in their own extended families. They belong to the Mollusca class Cephalopoda. But they don't look like their cousins at all."
The passage explains octopuses are different because -> other molluscs are "shelled invertebrates with a dorsal foot" but cephalopods are "all arms" and don't have shells.
From passage: "pretty much everything feeds on cephalopods, including humans"
This line is crucial -> it says all cephalopods (not just octopuses) are eaten by humans and other animals.
š Option 1 -> partial-truth -> Higher intelligence does make them misfits because passage says they have "brains the size of a walnut, which is large for an invertebrate" compared to other molluscs
š Option 2 -> partial-truth -> Having arms makes them misfits because other molluscs have "a dorsal foot" while "cephalopods are all arms"
š¢ Option 3 is correct -> This is shared by all cephalopods, not unique to octopuses. The passage says "everything feeds on cephalopods" - so being eaten doesn't make octopuses different from their cephalopod cousins
š Option 4 -> partial-truth -> Not having shells makes them misfits because "most" other molluscs "are shelled invertebrates" but cephalopods "don't have a shell covering them"
More from this set:
Question 2