Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.

There's a common idea that museum artworks are somehow timeless objects available to admire for generations to come. But many are objects of decay. Even the most venerable Old Master paintings don't escape: pigments discolour, varnishes crack, canvases warp. This challenging fact of art world life is down to something that sounds more like a thread from a morality tale: inherent vice. Damien Hirst's iconic shark floating in a tank entitled The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is a work that put a spotlight on inherent vice. When he made it in 1991, Hirst got himself in a pickle by not using the right kind of pickle to preserve the giant fish. The result was that the shark began to decompose quite quickly its preserving liquid clouding, the skin wrinkling, and an unpleasant smell wafting from the tank.

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 1

We need to find the main message about museum artworks and what challenge they face.

From passage: "There's a common idea that museum artworks are somehow timeless objects available to admire for generations to come. But many are objects of decay."

The passage starts by breaking a myth -> artworks are NOT timeless -> they actually decay naturally. This happens because of "inherent vice" -> the materials themselves cause problems over time.

The author gives two clear examples:

  • Old Master paintings -> pigments change color, varnishes crack, canvases bend
  • Hirst's shark -> decomposed because of wrong preservation method

Key insight: The passage focuses on the natural fact that artworks decay, not on who should fix this problem.


Now let's check each option:

🟒 Option 1 -> correct -> captures the core message that artworks naturally deteriorate and it's challenging to slow this down. Doesn't blame anyone or assign responsibility.

πŸ”΄ Option 2 -> contradicts passage -> calls artworks "timeless treasures" when the passage specifically says they're NOT timeless. Also focuses only on museums' duty.

πŸ”΄ Option 3 -> scope-error -> shifts focus to "moral responsibility" and artists vs museums. The passage isn't about responsibility - it's about the natural fact of decay.

πŸ”΄ Option 4 -> contradicts passage -> says "preserved forever" when the passage shows artworks cannot be preserved forever due to inherent vice.

Student confusion: You might think options 2, 3, 4 are correct because they mention preservation. But the passage isn't about solutions or who should preserve -> it's about the reality that artworks naturally decay.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question