Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Nature has all along yielded her flesh to humans. First, we took nature's materials as food, fibers, and shelter. Then we learned to extract raw materials from her biosphere to create our own new synthetic materials. Now Bios is yielding us her mind we are taking her logic.

Clockwork logicβ€”the logic of the machines will only build simple contraptions. Truly complex systems such as a cell, a meadow, an economy, or a brain (natural or artificial) require a rigorous nontechnological logic. We now see that no logic except bio-logic can assemble a thinking device, or even a workable system of any magnitude.

It is an astounding discovery that one can extract the logic of Bios out of biology and have something useful. Although many philosophers in the past have suspected one could abstract the laws of life and apply them elsewhere, it wasn't until the complexity of computers and human-made systems became as complicated as living things, that it was possible to prove this. It's eerie how much of life can be transferred. So far, some of the traits of the living that have successfully been transported to mechanical systems are: self-replication, self- governance, limited self-repair, mild evolution, and partial learning.

We have reason to believe yet more can be synthesized and made into something new. Yet at the same time that the logic of Bios is being imported into machines, the logic of Technos is being imported into life. The root of bioengineering is the desire to control the organic long enough to improve it. Domesticated plants and animals are examples of techno-logics applied to life. The wild aromatic root of the Queen Anne's lace weed has been fine-tuned over generations by selective herb gatherers until it has evolved into a sweet carrot of the garden; the udders of wild bovines have been selectively enlarged in a "unnatural" way to satisfy humans rather than calves. Milk cows and carrots, therefore, are human inventions as much as steam engines and gunpowder are. But milk cows and carrots are more indicative of the kind of inventions humans will make in the future: products that are grown rather than manufactured.

Genetic engineering is precisely what cattle breeders do when they select better strains of Holsteins, only bioengineers employ more precise and powerful control. While carrot and milk cow breeders had to rely on diffuse organic evolution, modern genetic engineers can use directed artificial evolution a purposeful design which greatly accelerates improvements.

The overlap of the mechanical and the lifelike increases year by year. Part of this bionic convergence is a matter of words. The meanings of "mechanical" and "life" are both stretching until all complicated things can be perceived as machines, and all self-sustaining machines can be perceived as alive. Yet beyond semantics, two concrete trends are happening:(1) Human-made things are behaving more lifelike, and (2) Life is becoming more engineered. The apparent veil between the organic and the manufactured has crumpled to reveal that the two really are, and have always been, of one being.

The author claims that, "The apparent veil between the organic and the manufactured has crumpled to reveal that the two really are, and have always been, of one being." Which one of the following statements best expresses the point being made by the author here?

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 1

Step-by-step thinking process:

  1. What is the "veil"? -> The boundary that seemed to separate the organic from the manufactured
  2. Why "apparent"? -> The boundary only looked real; it was never a true divide
  3. What made it "crumple"? -> Two trends: machines becoming lifelike and life becoming engineered
  4. What does "of one being" mean? -> Organic and manufactured are essentially the same kind of thing, so telling them apart gets harder and harder

From passage: "The overlap of the mechanical and the lifelike increases year by year"

From passage: "(1) Human-made things are behaving more lifelike, and (2) Life is becoming more engineered"

Thought process:

Veil = line between organic and manufactured -> Scientific advances (bio-logic in machines, techno-logic in life) keep increasing the overlap -> The line collapses -> Distinguishing organic from manufactured becomes increasingly difficult


Elimination strategy: The wrong options reuse the words of the quote ("apparent", "veil", "crumpled", "being") but rearrange them into meanings the author never intended. Check what the veil separates and what crumpled.

🟒 Option 1 -> correct -> Captures the core point: scientific advances (bioengineering, lifelike machines) are making the organic and the manufactured harder to tell apart. This matches the "overlap increases year by year" idea and the two concrete trends the author describes.

πŸ”΄ Option 2 -> opposite -> Treats "apparent" as a kind of reality and claims the two realities are still clearly distinguished (one is manufactured). The author says the exact opposite: the distinction is dissolving.

πŸ”΄ Option 3 -> distortion -> Says organic reality crumpled "under the veil of manufacturing", as if manufacturing overpowered nature. In the passage it is the veil that crumpled, not organic reality, and the convergence runs both ways. It also invents an "apparent vs real" contrast that the author never makes.

πŸ”΄ Option 4 -> word-jumble -> Places the veil "between apparent and manufactured reality" and calls it an "organic veil". The veil in the passage lies between the organic and the manufactured. Same words as the quote, wrong relationships.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question