Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Spices were a global commodity centuries before European voyages. There was a complex chain of relations, yet consumers had little knowledge of producers and vice versa. Desire for spices helped fuel European colonial empires to create political, military and commercial networks under a single power.

Historians know a fair amount about the supply of spices in Europe during the medieval period – the origins, methods of transportation, the prices – but less about demand. Why go to such extraordinary efforts to procure expensive products from exotic lands? Still, demand was great enough to inspire the voyages of Christopher Columbus and Vasco Da Gama, launching the first fateful wave of European colonialism.

So, why were spices so highly prized in Europe in the centuries from about 1000 to 1500? One widely disseminated explanation for medieval demand for spices was that they covered the taste of spoiled meat.

Medieval purchasers consumed meat much fresher than what the average city-dweller in the developed world of today has at hand. However, refrigeration was not available, and some hot spices have been shown to serve as an anti-bacterial agent. Salting, smoking or drying meat were other means of preservation. Most spices used in cooking began as medical ingredients, and throughout the Middle Ages spices were used as both medicines and condiments. Above all, medieval recipes involve the combination of medical and culinary lore in order to balance food's humeral properties and prevent disease. Most spices were hot and dry and so appropriate in sauces to counteract the moist and wet properties supposedly possessed by most meat and fish.

Where spices came from was known in a vague sense centuries before the voyages of Columbus. Just how vague may be judged by looking at medieval world maps ... To the medieval European imagination, the East was exotic and alluring. Medieval maps often placed India close to the so-called Earthly Paradise, the Garden of Eden described in the Bible.

Geographical knowledge has a lot to do with the perceptions of spices' relative scarcity and the reasons for their high prices. An example of the varying notions of scarcity is the conflicting information about how pepper is harvested. As far back as the 7th century Europeans thought that pepper in India grew on trees "guarded" by serpents that would bite and poison anyone who attempted to gather the fruit. The only way to harvest pepper was to burn the trees, which would drive the snakes underground. Of course, this bit of lore would explain the shriveled black peppercorns, but not white, pink or other colors.

Spices never had the enduring allure or power of gold and silver or the commercial potential of new products such as tobacco, indigo or sugar. But the taste for spices did continue for a while beyond the Middle Ages. As late as the 17th century, the English and the Dutch were struggling for control of the Spice Islands: Dutch New Amsterdam, or New York, was exchanged by the British for one of the Moluccan Islands where nutmeg was grown.

It can be inferred that all of the following contributed to a decline in the allure of spices, EXCEPT:

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 1

We need to find what did NOT cause spices to become less popular. Three options will be reasons for decline, one won't be.


Step-by-step thinking process:

The passage explains why spices were so valuable from 1000-1500 -> then mentions their allure declined later. So we need to think: what made them valuable, and what changes would remove that value?

From passage: "Most spices used in cooking began as medical ingredients, and throughout the Middle Ages spices were used as both medicines and condiments... Most spices were hot and dry and so appropriate in sauces to counteract the moist and wet properties supposedly possessed by most meat and fish."

The passage shows spices were valued for: medical uses + food preservation + exotic scarcity + balancing food properties.

So decline would happen when these needs disappeared -> medical advances would reduce medicinal use -> refrigeration would reduce preservation needs -> cuisine changes could reduce cooking demand.

But increased availability? The passage doesn't suggest this caused decline - it just made them less exotic, but people still wanted them for medical/culinary reasons.


Option analysis:

πŸ”΄ Option 1 -> not a cause of decline -> The passage doesn't suggest increased availability caused people to want spices less - they were still needed for medicine and cooking, just less exotic

🟒 Option 2 -> would cause decline -> refrigeration would eliminate the need for spices to preserve meat and cover spoiled tastes

🟒 Option 3 -> would cause decline -> if medical treatments changed, people wouldn't need spices as medicines anymore

🟒 Option 4 -> would cause decline -> if European tastes in food changed, demand for spiced dishes would drop

The key insight: increased availability might make spices cheaper and less exotic, but wouldn't eliminate the actual uses that made people want them. The other three options remove the fundamental reasons people needed spices.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question