Solution
The correct answer is option 3. This is an EXCEPT question, so the correct choice is the one that does NOT weaken the passage's claims about hallucinatory tribal imagination. Option 3 states that shamanic rituals involving conversing with the dead often feature in tribal stories. Paragraph 3 explicitly describes how tribals worship terracotta or carved-wood objects representing ancestors and aspire to enter trances to converse with the dead. This detail is entirely consistent with the passage's portrayal of the tribal imagination as hallucinatory and dreamlike, so it would reinforce, not weaken, the passage's claims.
Option 1 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). The final paragraph states that tribal epics can begin from trivial everyday events and that paintings merge with living space. Excluding mundane reality from tribal art would directly contradict this claim, thereby weakening the argument.
Option 2 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). Paragraph 1 describes tribal stories in which oceans fly as birds and mountains swim as fish. If tribal stories instead depicted nature in accordance with rational scientific knowledge, this fantastical, hallucinatory quality would be undermined.
Option 4 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). The final paragraph emphasizes that tribal narratives make no deliberate attempt to follow a sequence and take on the chaotic shapes of dreams. A chronological beginning, middle, and end would directly contradict this non-sequential, hallucinatory character.
More from this set:
Question 17
Question 18