Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Once a society accepts a secular mode of creativity, within which the creator replaces God, imaginative transactions assume a self-conscious form. The tribal imagination, on the other hand, is still to a large extent dreamlike and hallucinatory. It admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural and artless manner. In tribal stories, oceans fly in the sky as birds, mountains swim in water as fish, animals speak as humans and stars grow like plants. Spatial order and temporal sequence do not restrict the narrative. This is not to say that tribal creations have no conventions or rules, but simply that they admit the principle of association between emotion and the narrative motif. Thus stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals can be angry, sad or happy.

It might be said that tribal artists work more on the basis of their racial and sensory memory than on the basis of a cultivated imagination. In order to understand this distinction, we must understand the difference between imagination and memory. In the animate world, consciousness meets two immediate material realities: space and time. We put meaning into space by perceiving it in terms of images. The image-making faculty is a genetic gift to the human mind—this power of imagination helps us understand the space that envelops us. With regard to time, we make connections with the help of memory; one remembers being the same person today as one was yesterday.

The tribal mind has a more acute sense of time than the sense of space. Somewhere along the history of human civilization, tribal communities seem to have realized that domination over territorial space was not their lot. Thus, they seem to have turned almost obsessively to gaining domination over time. This urge is substantiated in their ritual of conversing with their dead ancestors: year after year, tribals in many parts of India worship terracotta or carved-wood objects representing their ancestors, aspiring to enter a trance in which they can converse with the dead. Over the centuries, an amazingly sharp memory has helped tribals classify material and natural objects into a highly complex system of knowledge. . . .

One of the main characteristics of the tribal arts is their distinct manner of constructing space and imagery, which might be described as ‘hallucinatory’. In both oral and visual forms of representation, tribal artists seem to interpret verbal or pictorial space as demarcated by an extremely flexible ‘frame’. The boundaries between art and non-art become almost invisible. A tribal epic can begin its narration from a trivial everyday event; tribal paintings merge with living space as if the two were one and the same. And within the narrative itself, or within the painted imagery, there is no deliberate attempt to follow a sequence. The episodes retold and the images created take on the apparently chaotic shapes of dreams. In a way, the syntax of language and the grammar of painting are the same, as if literature were painted words and painting were a song of images.

Non-human living forms exhibit human emotions in tribal narratives because tribal narratives:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 2

The correct answer is option 2. The first paragraph explains that the tribal imagination "admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural and artless manner," giving examples such as animals speaking as humans and stars growing like plants. It then states that stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals can be angry, sad or happy because tribal narratives "admit the principle of association between emotion and the narrative motif." This fusion across different planes of being is precisely what option 2 captures with the phrase "existential fluidity" — the boundaries between human and non-human, animate and inanimate, are treated as permeable rather than fixed.

Option 1 is wrong (extreme). The passage explicitly cautions that "this is not to say that tribal creations have no conventions or rules." Claiming that tribal narratives "abandon all rules and regulations" directly contradicts this qualification, making the option an overstatement.

Option 3 is wrong (out of scope). The passage never characterizes tribal narratives as primitive or underdeveloped. On the contrary, it describes their complex knowledge systems and distinct artistic grammar. This option imposes a dismissive value judgement the author nowhere endorses.

Option 4 is wrong (reversed). The passage attributes a "self-conscious form" to secular creativity, not to tribal art. The tribal imagination is described as "dreamlike and hallucinatory" and "natural and artless," which is the opposite of self-conscious. This option reverses the distinction the passage draws between the two modes.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question