Solution
The correct answer is option 2. The first paragraph explains that the tribal imagination "admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural and artless manner," giving examples such as animals speaking as humans and stars growing like plants. It then states that stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals can be angry, sad or happy because tribal narratives "admit the principle of association between emotion and the narrative motif." This fusion across different planes of being is precisely what option 2 captures with the phrase "existential fluidity" — the boundaries between human and non-human, animate and inanimate, are treated as permeable rather than fixed.
Option 1 is wrong (extreme). The passage explicitly cautions that "this is not to say that tribal creations have no conventions or rules." Claiming that tribal narratives "abandon all rules and regulations" directly contradicts this qualification, making the option an overstatement.
Option 3 is wrong (out of scope). The passage never characterizes tribal narratives as primitive or underdeveloped. On the contrary, it describes their complex knowledge systems and distinct artistic grammar. This option imposes a dismissive value judgement the author nowhere endorses.
Option 4 is wrong (reversed). The passage attributes a "self-conscious form" to secular creativity, not to tribal art. The tribal imagination is described as "dreamlike and hallucinatory" and "natural and artless," which is the opposite of self-conscious. This option reverses the distinction the passage draws between the two modes.
More from this set:
Question 17