Solution
The author spends most of the passage showing how the printing press opened minds, spread ideas, and helped democracy. Then asks: has the iPhone done the same thing? The answer comes in the final paragraph.
From passage: "The hope of the iPhone, and the Internet in general, was that it would free people in closed societies. But the failure of the Arab Spring, and the continued suppression of ideas in North Korea, China and Iran, has not borne that out."
From passage: "But I'm not sure if the world changed for the better with the iPhone as it did with the printing press or merely, changed."
Author's thought process -> Printing press opened minds and spread freedom -> iPhone was hoped to do the same -> But it hasn't succeeded in freeing closed societies -> So iPhone hasn't been as successful as printing press in opening minds.
š Option 1 -> scope-error -> Focuses only on advantages vs disadvantages, but the main conclusion isn't about weighing pros and cons. It's about comparing effectiveness in opening minds specifically.
š¢ Option 2 -> captures the main conclusion accurately -> Directly matches the author's comparison between iPhone and printing press effectiveness in opening people's minds and spreading freedom.
š Option 3 -> context-shift -> The author never says iPhone is disappointing because of rapid change. The disappointment is about not achieving the same mind-opening success as printing press.
š Option 4 -> partial-truth -> Yes, the passage mentions daydreaming became a "lost art," but this minor point isn't the main conclusion. The main conclusion is about comparative success in opening minds.
More from this set:
Question 7
Question 8