Solution
Let us trace the logic step by step.
The author builds an argument about future cars -> talks about self-driving technology -> then connects this to Uber's vision. The key is understanding this logical flow.
From passage: "The logical outcome of cars which need no driver is that they will become cars which need no owner either. Instead, they will work as taxis do, summoned at will but only for the journeys we actually need. This the future towards which Uber is working."
Thought process: Author mentions self-driving cars -> no driver needed -> logical next step is no owner needed -> cars become like taxis -> this is Uber's business model -> so private cars transform into public transport system.
š Option 1 -> scope-error -> talks about collision prevention which is paragraph 5, but Uber example is in paragraph 6 for a different reason
š Option 2 -> partial-truth -> mentions traffic jams ending but misses the main point. Traffic jams ending is just a result of cars becoming public transport, not the main argument
š¢ Option 3 -> correct -> captures exactly what Uber example shows. Author says cars will work "as taxis do" and mentions "This the future towards which Uber is working"
š“ Option 4 -> irrelevant -> completely off-topic. Author never compares Uber sales to Tesla sales. This creates a comparison that doesn't exist in the passage
The key insight: When author mentions Uber, he's showing how private ownership will disappear and cars will become shared resources - exactly like public transport.
More from this set:
Question 16