Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.

A fundamental property of language is that it is slippery and messy and more liquid than solid, a gelatinous mass that changes shape to fit. As Wittgenstein would remind us, "usage has no sharp boundary." Oftentimes, the only way to determine the meaning of a word is to examine how it is used. This insight is often described as the "meaning is use" doctrine. There are differences between the "meaning is use" doctrine and a dictionary first theory of meaning. "The dictionary's careful fixing of words to definitions, like butterflies pinned under glass, can suggest that this is how language works. The definitions can seem to ensure and fix the meaning of words, just as the gold standard can back a country's currency." What Wittgenstein found in the circulation of ordinary language, however, was a free floating currency of meaning. The value of each word arises out of the exchange. The lexicographer abstracts a meaning from that exchange, which is then set within the conventions of the dictionary definition.

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 3

Step-by-step thinking process:

First, identify what the passage is saying about language -> Language is fluid and messy, not fixed like solid things

Then, notice the contrast being made -> Dictionary definitions (static/fixed) vs. actual language usage (dynamic/flowing)

Finally, understand the relationship -> Dictionaries take meanings FROM usage, not the other way around

From passage: "The lexicographer abstracts a meaning from that exchange, which is then set within the conventions of the dictionary definition."

Thought process: Passage says language is like liquid -> meaning comes from how people use words -> dictionaries capture this meaning after people use it -> so dictionaries follow usage, not lead it


Option Analysis:

🟠 Option 1 -> partial-truth -> Says dictionaries are artificial and meaning comes from exchange, but misses that dictionaries actually capture meaning FROM exchange (doesn't explain the process)

πŸ”΄ Option 2 -> opposite-claim -> Says "meaning in use" makes problems worse, but passage supports the "meaning is use" idea as correct way to understand language

🟒 Option 3 -> complete-answer -> Gets both parts right: meaning is dynamic (from usage) and definitions are static (captured from that usage)

πŸ”΄ Option 4 -> opposite-claim -> Says dictionary meanings are better than exchange meanings, but passage argues the opposite - that exchange creates real meaning

Student confusion: You might think Option 1 sounds right because it mentions exchange value. But it's incomplete - it doesn't explain how dictionaries actually work (they extract FROM usage). Option 3 gives the full picture.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question