Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Despite their fierce reputation. Vikings may not have always been the plunderers and pillagers popular culture imagines them to be. In fact, they got their start trading in northern European markets, researchers suggest.

Combs carved from animal antlers, as well as comb manufacturing waste and raw antler material has turned up at three archaeological sites in Denmark, including a medieval marketplace in the city of Ribe. A team of researchers from Denmark and the U.K. hoped to identify the species of animal to which the antlers once belonged by analyzing collagen proteins in the samples and comparing them across the animal kingdom, Laura Geggel reports for LiveScience. Somewhat surprisingly, molecular analysis of the artifacts revealed that some combs and other material had been carved from reindeer antlers. Given that reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) don't live in Denmark, the researchers posit that it arrived on Viking ships from Norway. Antler craftsmanship, in the form of decorative combs, was part of Viking culture. Such combs served as symbols of good health, Geggel writes. The fact that the animals shed their antlers also made them easy to collect from the large herds that inhabited Norway.

Since the artifacts were found in marketplace areas at each site it's more likely that the Norsemen came to trade rather than pillage. Most of the artifacts also date to the 780780 s, but some are as old as 725725. That predates the beginning of Viking raids on Great Britain by about 7070 years. (Traditionally, the so-called "Viking Age" began with these raids in 793793 and ended with the Norman conquest of Great Britain in 1066.) Archaeologists had suspected that the Vikings had experience with long maritime voyages [that] might have preceded their raiding days. Beyond Norway, these combs would have been a popular industry in Scandinavia as well. It's possible that the antler combs represent a larger trade network, where the Norsemen supplied raw material to craftsmen in Denmark and elsewhere.

The primary purpose of the passage is:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 3

We need to find the main purpose - what's the author really trying to do here? Let us trace the logic step by step.

The passage opens with "Despite their fierce reputation, Vikings may not have always been the plunderers and pillagers popular culture imagines them to be." This immediately signals the author wants to challenge how we think about Vikings.

Then it provides evidence -> reindeer antler combs found in Danish marketplaces -> these came from Norway -> Vikings must have been trading before they were raiding.

From passage: "Since the artifacts were found in marketplace areas at each site it's more likely that the Norsemen came to trade rather than pillage. Most of the artifacts also date to the 780s, but some are as old as 725. That predates the beginning of Viking raids on Great Britain by about 70 years."

The logic flow: Popular image says Vikings = raiders -> But archaeological evidence shows -> They were traders first -> This challenges the popular perception.


🟠 Option 1 -> scope-error -> focuses only on explaining the combs, but the combs are just evidence for a bigger point about challenging Viking perception

🔴 Option 2 -> context-shift -> the passage mentions dates but isn't trying to change official Viking Age dates - it's using those dates to show trade came before raiding

🟠 Option 4 -> degree-error -> says Vikings were both raiders and traders, but the passage argues they were traders first, before becoming raiders

🟢 Option 3 is correct -> captures both the challenge to popular perception and the use of archaeological evidence perfectly

The key insight: Don't get distracted by the specific evidence (combs, dates). Focus on the bigger argument the author is making with that evidence.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question