Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Keeping time accurately comes with a price. The maximum accuracy of a clock is directly related to how much disorder, or entropy, it creates every time it ticks. Natalia Ares at the University of Oxford and her colleagues made this discovery using a tiny clock with an accuracy that can be controlled. The clock consists of a 50-nanometre-thick membrane of silicon nitride, vibrated by an electric current. Each time the membrane moved up and down once and then returned to its original position, the researchers counted a tick, and the regularity of the spacing between the ticks represented the accuracy of the clock. The researchers found that as they increased the clock's accuracy, the heat produced in the system grew, increasing the entropy of its surroundings by jostling nearby particles. "If a clock is more accurate, you are paying for it somehow," says Ares. In this case, you pay for it by pouring more ordered energy into the clock, which is then converted into entropy. "By measuring time, we are increasing the entropy of the universe," says Ares. The more entropy there is in the universe, the closer it may be to its eventual demise. "Maybe we should stop measuring time," says Ares. The scale of the additional entropy is so small, though, that there is no need to worry about its effects, she says.

The increase in entropy in timekeeping may be related to the "arrow of time", says Marcus Huber at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, who was part of the research team. It has been suggested that the reason that time only flows forward, not in reverse, is that the total amount of entropy in the universe is constantly increasing, creating disorder that cannot be put in order again.

The relationship that the researchers found is a limit on the accuracy of a clock, so it doesn't mean that a clock that creates the most possible entropy would be maximally accurate -hence a large, inefficient grandfather clock isn't more precise than an atomic clock. "It's a bit like fuel use in a car. Just because I'm using more fuel doesn't mean that I'm going faster or further," says Huber.

When the researchers compared their results with theoretical models developed for clocks that rely on quantum effects, they were surprised to find that the relationship between accuracy and entropy seemed to be the same for both. We can't be sure yet that these results are actually universal, though, because there are many types of clocks for which the relationship between accuracy and entropy haven't been tested. "It's still unclear how this principle plays out in real devices such as atomic clocks, which push the ultimate quantum limits of accuracy," says Mark Mitchison at Trinity College Dublin in Ireland. Understanding this relationship could be helpful for designing clocks in the future, particularly those used in quantum computers and other devices where both accuracy and temperature are crucial, says Ares. This finding could also help us understand more generally how the quantum world and the classical world are similar and different in terms of thermodynamics and the passage of time.

The author makes all of the following arguments in the passage, EXCEPT that:

Solution

āœ… Correct Option: 2

Let us trace through the key claims step by step.

The passage discusses how clock accuracy relates to entropy creation. The main discovery is that more accurate clocks create more disorder (entropy) as the "price" for their precision.

From passage: "The researchers found that as they increased the clock's accuracy, the heat produced in the system grew, increasing the entropy of its surroundings... In this case, you pay for it by pouring more ordered energy into the clock, which is then converted into entropy."

Key insight: Heat is produced -> but entropy is the actual price paid. The passage makes a distinction between what happens (heat production) and what the cost actually is (entropy increase).


🟢 Option 1 -> directly stated -> "We can't be sure yet that these results are actually universal" clearly shows uncertainty about applying this to all clocks

šŸ”“ Option 2 -> misrepresents the argument -> Says heat is the "price paid" but passage argues entropy is the price, while heat just causes entropy increase

🟠 Option 3 -> contradicts passage -> Passage says grandfather clock "isn't more precise than an atomic clock" meaning atomic clocks ARE more accurate

🟢 Option 4 -> directly stated -> "both accuracy and temperature are crucial" for quantum computer clocks


The confusion often comes between options 2 and 3. Both seem wrong, but option 2 is the tricky one. Students might think: "The passage mentions heat production, so isn't that the price?"

The key distinction: Heat production happens -> this causes entropy increase -> entropy is the actual cost. Heat is just the mechanism, not the price itself.

Option 3 is clearly contradicted, but option 2 subtly misrepresents the causal relationship the author establishes.

This was a highly controversial question. The official answer key says option 2 but we believe the right option is 3. However, we're keeping option 2 as the answer-key as CAT officials gave marks for option 2 only.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question