The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
People view idleness as a sin and industriousness as a virtue, and in the process have developed an unsatisfactory relationship with their jobs. Work has become a way for them to keep busy, even though many find their work meaningless. In their need for activity people undertake what was once considered work (fishing, gardening) as hobbies. The opposing view is that hard work has made us prosperous and improved our levels of health and education. It has also brought innovation and labour and time-saving devices, which have lessened life's drudgery.
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
People view idleness as a sin and industriousness as a virtue, and in the process have developed an unsatisfactory relationship with their jobs. Work has become a way for them to keep busy, even though many find their work meaningless. In their need for activity people undertake what was once considered work (fishing, gardening) as hobbies. The opposing view is that hard work has made us prosperous and improved our levels of health and education. It has also brought innovation and labour and time-saving devices, which have lessened life's drudgery.
Solution
We need to find the option that captures both sides of the argument about hard work.
From passage: "Work has become a way for them to keep busy, even though many find their work meaningless" and "hard work has made us prosperous and improved our levels of health and education."
The passage shows two views -> First view says obsession with hard work creates problems (meaningless work, bad job relationships) -> Second view says hard work brings benefits (prosperity, health, education, innovation).
I need an option that includes both negative and positive aspects without adding extra ideas.
π΄ Option 1 -> scope-error -> Only talks about the positive side of hard work (prosperity, education, innovation) but completely ignores the negative side (meaningless jobs, unsatisfactory relationships). Also says hard work is "essential" which the passage never concludes.
π΄ Option 2 -> context-shift -> Says hard work "led to greater idleness" but the passage actually says people do former work activities (fishing, gardening) as hobbies now, not that they became more idle. This twists the meaning.
π΄ Option 3 -> overstates -> Adds a recommendation that "people should reserve leisure time for idleness" which isn't in the passage at all. The passage just presents two views, it doesn't give advice.
π’ Option 4 -> correct -> Captures both sides perfectly. "Idealisation of hard work" matches the passage's idea of viewing it as a "virtue." Shows the negative side (meaningless jobs, endless activity) and the positive side (prosperity, innovation) without adding extra ideas.