One day, Rahul started a work at AM and Gautam joined him two hours later. They then worked together and completed the work at PM the same day. If both had started at AM and worked together, the work would have been completed minutes earlier. Working alone, the time Rahul would have taken, in hours, to complete the work is
One day, Rahul started a work at AM and Gautam joined him two hours later. They then worked together and completed the work at PM the same day. If both had started at AM and worked together, the work would have been completed minutes earlier. Working alone, the time Rahul would have taken, in hours, to complete the work is
Solution
We need to set up equations based on the given information and solve systematically.
Let us define our variables clearly:
R = Rahul's work rate (fraction of work completed per hour)
G = Gautam's work rate (fraction of work completed per hour)
W = Total work (we can set this as 1 unit for simplicity)
Scenario 1 (What actually happened):
Rahul works alone from 9 AM to 11 AM = 2 hours
Both work together from 11 AM to 5 PM = 6 hours
Total time: Rahul works 8 hours, Gautam works 6 hours
Scenario 2 (If both started together):
Both work together from 9 AM to 4:30 PM = 7.5 hours
They finish 30 minutes earlier than 5 PM
From Scenario 1:
Work done by Rahul + Work done by Gautam = Total work
From Scenario 2:
Work done by both together = Total work
Since both expressions equal W, we can set them equal:
Expanding the right side:
This tells us that Rahul is 3 times as efficient as Gautam.
Substituting R = 3G back into equation (1):
Therefore:
Since Rahul's rate is (he completes 1/10 of the work per hour), he would need 10 hours to complete the entire work alone.
Key Insight: This problem demonstrates how comparing different work scenarios helps us find individual efficiencies. The 30-minute difference gave us the crucial relationship between their work rates.