Solution
Need to find what the passage actually says about migration patterns and connections.
From passage: "Their work reveals a world that is outward-looking - full of movement, border-crossing and south-south interconnection... This has the effect of remapping the world in the reader's mind, as centred in the interconnected global south."
The key insight -> passage emphasizes south-south connections, not north-south connections. The Indian Ocean world is presented as separate from European/US-centered narratives.
From passage: "For much of history, travel by sea was much easier than by land, which meant that port cities very far apart were often more easily connected to each other than to much closer inland cities."
This shows geography (being a port) mattered more than proximity -> supports option 1 as true.
š¢ Option 1 -> TRUE -> passage clearly states port cities far apart connected better than nearby inland cities due to sea travel ease
š¢ Option 2 -> TRUE -> passage mentions "largely Islamic space" (religious) and traders/nakhodas (commercial) shaping the region
š¢ Option 3 -> TRUE -> passage says migration was "often a matter of force" and "portrayed as abandonment rather than adventure" but also mentions rich history -> shows mixed/ambivalent experience
š“ Option 4 -> FALSE -> passage emphasizes "south-south interconnection" and contrasts Indian Ocean world against Europe/US-centered narratives, not connecting with them
The confusion might be thinking the Indian Ocean world connected everything globally. But the passage specifically contrasts it against the global north (Europe/US), focusing on connections within the global south instead.
More from this set:
Question 10