Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer.

  1. What precisely are the "unusual elements" that make a particular case so attractive to a certain kind of audience?
  2. It might be a particularly savage or unfathomable level of depravity, very often it has something to do with the precise amount of mystery involved.
  3. Unsolved, and perhaps unsolvable cases offer something that "ordinary" murder doesn't.
  4. Why are some crimes destined for perpetual re-examination and others locked into permanent obscurity?

Entered answer:

Solution

✅ Correct Answer: 4123

From passage: The sentences discuss crimes that get "perpetual re-examination" versus those in "permanent obscurity" and what makes cases attractive to audiences.

My thought process: Start broad → narrow down → provide answers → elaborate

Sentence 4 asks the big picture question about why some crimes stay famous while others are forgotten → Sentence 1 then asks the specific question about what unusual elements make cases attractive → Sentence 2 answers that question by listing possible elements → Sentence 3 elaborates on one specific type (unsolved cases).


The sequence should be: 4-1-2-3

🟢 4123 is correct → follows perfect logical progression: broad question → specific question → answer → elaboration

This creates smooth flow: "Why do some crimes stay famous?" → "What specific elements attract audiences?" → "It might be depravity or mystery" → "Unsolved cases offer something special"

Each sentence connects naturally to the next, building from general concept to specific details.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question