Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The only thing worse than being lied to is not knowing you're being lied to. It's true that plastic pollution is a huge problem, of planetary proportions. And it's true we could all do more to reduce our plastic footprint. The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it.

Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper. You struggle to find a place to do it and feel pleased when you succeed. But your effort is wholly inadequate and distracts from the real problem of why the building is collapsing in the first place. The real problem is that single-use plastic the very idea of producing plastic items like grocery bags, which we use for an average of 1212 minutes but can persist in the environment for half a millennium is an incredibly reckless abuse of technology. Encouraging individuals to recycle more will never solve the problem of a massive production of single-use plastic that should have been avoided in the first place.

As an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, I have had a disturbing window into the accumulating literature on the hazards of plastic pollution. Scientists have long recognized that plastics biodegrade slowly, if at all, and pose multiple threats to wildlife through entanglement and consumption. More recent reports highlight dangers posed by absorption of toxic chemicals in the water and by plastic odors that mimic some species' natural food. Plastics also accumulate up the food chain, and studies now show that we are likely ingesting it ourselves in seafood.

Beginning in the 1950s, big beverage companies like Coca-Cola and Anheuser-Busch, along with Phillip Morris and others, formed a non-profit called Keep America Beautiful. Its mission is/was to educate and encourage environmental stewardship in the public. At face value, these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate green washing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management. The greatest success of Keep America Beautiful has been to shift the onus of environmental responsibility onto the public while simultaneously becoming a trusted name in the environmental movement.

So what can we do to make responsible use of plastic a reality? First: reject the lie. Litterbugs are not responsible for the global ecological disaster of plastic. Humans can only function to the best of their abilities, given time, mental bandwidth and systemic constraints. Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world's oceans. Recycling is also too hard in most parts of the U.S. and lacks the proper incentives to make it work well.

In the first paragraph, the author uses "lie" to refer to the:

Solution

āœ… Correct Option: 4

The key to solving this question is to find the exact sentence where the author defines what "the lie" is. Step 1: Look for where the author directly tells us what "the lie" is -> Don't get distracted by the opening sentence about being lied to.

Step 2: Find the sentence that starts with "The lie is..." -> This gives us the direct answer.

From passage: "The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it."

Thought process: Author says plastic pollution IS real -> Individual action IS needed -> BUT the lie is blaming consumers for the whole problem -> Real problem is corporate production of single-use plastics.


Option Analysis:

šŸ”“ Option 1 -> contradicts passage -> Author clearly states plastic pollution IS "a huge problem of planetary proportions" - no understatement here

šŸ”“ Option 2 -> scope-error -> The lie isn't about recycling effects being understated - it's about who gets blamed for the problem

šŸ”“ Option 3 -> context-shift -> This refers to the opening sentence, but "the lie" specifically refers to something else in the passage

🟢 Option 4 -> perfect match -> Directly matches "blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers" from the passage

Student confusion alert: You might think Option 3 sounds right because the first sentence mentions "not knowing you're being lied to." But the author uses "THE lie" to refer to something specific - always look for that direct definition!

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question