Solution
We need to find what solution Bradshaw would support based on her main argument about elephant aggression.
From passage: "Elephants are suffering and behaving in the same ways that we recognize in ourselves as a result of violence... brain organization and early development of elephants and humans are extremely similar."
Let us trace Bradshaw's argument step by step:
- Traditional view -> elephant aggression comes from high testosterone or resource competition
- Bradshaw's view -> elephant aggression comes from trauma (like PTSD in humans)
- Evidence -> orphaned elephants show "behavior typically associated with post-traumatic stress disorder"
- Key insight -> elephants and humans have "extremely similar" brain organization and trauma responses
So Bradshaw believes elephant aggression = trauma response (just like human PTSD)
Therefore, her solution would be -> treat elephant trauma using human trauma treatment methods
š¢ Option 1 -> correct -> directly applies Bradshaw's core argument that elephant trauma = human trauma, so human PTSD treatments could work for elephants
š“ Option 2 -> scope-error -> focuses on research about calf isolation, but Bradshaw wants treatment for existing trauma, not more research
š Option 3 -> context-shift -> Bradshaw already accepts human-elephant similarity as proven fact. She's moved beyond proving similarities to using them for solutions
š“ Option 4 -> contradicts thesis -> studying testosterone directly opposes Bradshaw's main point that trauma (not testosterone) causes aggression
Student confusion: Some might pick Option 3 because Bradshaw talks about similarities. But she already established these similarities - now she wants to use them for treatment, not research them more.