Skip to main contentSkip to solution

174 incidents of piracy were reported to the International Maritime Bureau last year, with Somali pirates responsible for only three. The rest ranged from the discreet theft of coils of rope in the Yellow Sea to the notoriously ferocious Nigerian gunmen attacking and hijacking oil tankers in the Gulf of Guinea, as well as armed robbery off Singapore and the Venezuelan coast and kidnapping in the Sundarbans in the Bay of Bengal. For Dr. Peter Lehr, an expert on modern-day piracy, the phenomenon's history should be a source of instruction rather than entertainment, piracy past offering lessons for piracy present.

But where does piracy begin or end? According to St Augustine, a corsair captain once told Alexander the Great that in the forceful acquisition of power and wealth at sea, the difference between an emperor and a pirate was simply one of scale. By this logic, European empire-builders were the most successful pirates of all time. A more eclectic history might have included the conquistadors, Vasco da Gama and the East India Company. But Lehr sticks to the disorganised small fry, making comparisons with the renegades of today possible.

The main motive for piracy has always been a combination of need and greed. Why toil away as a starving peasant in the 16th century when a successful pirate made up to Β£4,000 on each raid? Anyone could turn to freebooting if the rewards were worth the risk.

Increased globalisation has done more to encourage piracy than suppress it. European colonialism weakened delicate balances of power, leading to an influx of opportunists on the high seas. A rise in global shipping has meant rich pickings for freebooters. Lehr writes: β€œIt quickly becomes clear that in those parts of the world that have not profited from globalization and modernisation, and where abject poverty and the daily struggle for survival is still a reality, the root causes of piracy are still the same as they were a couple of hundred years ago."

Modern pirate prevention has failed. After the French yacht Le Gonant was ransomed for $2million in 2008, opportunists from all over Somalia flocked to the coast for a piece of the action. A consistent rule, even today, is there are never enough warships to patrol pirate-infested waters. Such ships are costly and only solve the problem temporarily; Somali piracy is bound to return as soon as the warships are withdrawn. Robot shipping, eliminating hostages, has been proposed as a possible solution; but as Lehr points out, this will only make pirates switch their targets to smaller carriers unable to afford the technology.

His advice isn't new. Proposals to end illegal fishing are often advanced but they are difficult to enforce. Investment in local welfare put a halt to Malaysian piracy in the 1970s, but was dependent on money somehow filtering through a corrupt bureaucracy to the poor on the periphery. Diplomatic initiatives against piracy are plagued by mutual distrust: the Russians execute pirates, while the EU and US are reluctant to capture them for fear they'll claim asylum.

The author ascribes the rise in piracy today to all of the following factors EXCEPT:

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 1

From passage: "A rise in global shipping has meant rich pickings for freebooters" and "European colonialism weakened delicate balances of power, leading to an influx of opportunists on the high seas"

The passage clearly talks about rewards -> "After the French yacht Le Gonant was ransomed for $2million in 2008, opportunists from all over Somalia flocked to the coast for a piece of the action"

Nowwe need to check if decreased surveillance is mentioned as a cause of piracy's rise.


The key confusion here is between causes of piracy vs reasons piracy continues. Students often mix these up!

The passage mentions warships, but look carefully at the context -> it's about why prevention fails, not what caused piracy to rise.

From passage: "A consistent rule, even today, is there are never enough warships to patrol pirate-infested waters"

This talks about ongoing problems with stopping piracy -> not what made it rise in the first place.


πŸ”΄ Option 1 -> not mentioned as cause -> passage talks about lack of warships in context of failed prevention, not as reason for piracy's rise

🟒 Option 2 is mentioned -> "rise in global shipping has meant rich pickings" directly links shipping growth to piracy increase

🟒 Option 3 is mentioned -> ransoms clearly shown as motivating factor with specific examples like Le Gonant case

🟒 Option 4 is mentioned -> "European colonialism weakened delicate balances of power, leading to influx of opportunists"

The answer is Option 1 because surveillance issues are discussed as prevention failures, not causes of piracy's rise.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question