Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Grove snails as a whole are distributed all over Europe, but a specific variety of the snail, with a distinctive white-lipped shell, is found exclusively in Ireland and in the Pyrenees mountains that lie on the border between France and Spain. The researchers sampled a total of 423423 snail specimens from 3636 sites distributed across Europe, with an emphasis on gathering large numbers of the white-lipped variety. When they sequenced genes from the mitochondrial DNA of each of these snails and used algorithms to analyze the genetic diversity between them, they found that a distinct lineage (the snails with the whitelipped shells) was indeed endemic to the two very specific and distant places in question.

Explaining this is tricky. Previously, some had speculated that the strange distributions of creatures such as the white-lipped grove snails could be explained by convergent evolution in which two populations evolve the same trait by coincidence but the underlying genetic similarities between the two groups rules that out. Alternately, some scientists had suggested that the white-lipped variety had simply spread over the whole continent, then been wiped out everywhere besides Ireland and the Pyrenees, but the researchers say their sampling and subsequent DNA analysis eliminate that possibility too. "If the snails naturally colonized Ireland, you would expect to find some of the same genetic type in other areas of Europe, especially Britain. We just don't find them," Davidson, the lead author, said in a press statement.

Moreover, if they'd gradually spread across the continent, there would be some genetic variation within the white-lipped type, because evolution would introduce variety over the thousands of years it would have taken them to spread from the Pyrenees to Ireland. That variation doesn't exist, at least in the genes sampled. This means that rather than the organism gradually expanding its range, large populations instead were somehow moved en mass to the other location within the space of a few dozen generations, ensuring a lack of genetic variety.

"There is a very clear pattern, which is difficult to explain except by involving humans," Davidson said. Humans, after all, colonized Ireland roughly 9,000 years ago, and the oldest fossil evidence of grove snails in Ireland dates to roughly the same era. Additionally, there is archaeological evidence of early sea trade between the ancient peoples of Spain and Ireland via the Atlantic and even evidence that humans routinely ate these types of snails before the advent of agriculture, as their burnt shells have been found in Stone Age trash heaps.

The simplest explanation, then? Boats. These snails may have inadvertently traveled on the floor of the small, coast-hugging skiffs these early humans used for travel, or they may have been intentionally carried to Ireland by the seafarers as a food source. "The highways of the past were rivers and the ocean-as the river that flanks the Pyrenees was an ancient trade route to the Atlantic, what we're actually seeing might be the long lasting legacy of snails that hitched a ride as humans travelled from the South of France to Ireland 8,000 years ago," Davidson said.

Which one of the following makes the author eliminate convergent evolution as a probable explanation for why white-lipped grove snails are found in Ireland and the Pyrenees?

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 2

We need to find what evidence made the author rule out convergent evolution as an explanation. Let us trace through the passage to see how this argument unfolds.

First,we need to understand what convergent evolution means -> two separate populations independently evolve the same trait by coincidence. If this happened, the Irish and Pyrenean snails would look similar but have different genetic backgrounds.

From passage: "the underlying genetic similarities between the two groups rules that out"

This tells me the snails from both places have similar genetics, which rules out convergent evolution. But there's more detail later.

From passage: "Moreover, if they'd gradually spread across the continent, there would be some genetic variation within the white-lipped type... That variation doesn't exist"

This is key -> the lack of genetic variation between Irish and Pyrenean snails suggests they were moved quickly (by humans) rather than evolving separately over time.


🟠 Option 1 -> scope-error -> talks about absence of similarities with Britain/other Europe, but the convergent evolution argument is specifically about Ireland vs Pyrenees similarity, not dissimilarity with other places

🟒 Option 2 -> correct -> captures the key evidence - no genetic variation between Ireland and Pyrenees snails means they didn't evolve separately (which convergent evolution would require)

πŸ”΄ Option 3 -> context-shift -> this IS convergent evolution itself, not what rules it out. Student confusion here: this describes the theory, not the evidence against it

🟠 Option 4 -> partial-truth -> mentions they found a distinct lineage but doesn't explain why this rules out convergent evolution specifically

The tricky part here is Option 3 - students might think "coincidental evolution" is the answer, but that's actually describing convergent evolution, not the evidence against it.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question