Skip to main contentSkip to solution

NOT everything looks lovelier the longer and closer its inspection. But Saturn does. It is gorgeous through Earthly telescopes. However, the 1313 years of close observation provided by Cassini, an American spacecraft, showed the planet, its moons and its remarkable rings off better and better, revealing finer structures, striking novelties and greater drama.

By and large the big things in the solar system planets and moons are thought of as having been around since the beginning. The suggestion that rings and moons are new is, though, made even more interesting by the fact that one of those moons, Enceladus, is widely considered the most promising site in the solar system on which to look for alien life. If Enceladus is both young and bears life, that life must have come into being quickly. This is also believed to have been the case on Earth. Were it true on Enceladus, that would encourage the idea that life evolves easily when conditions are right.

One reason for thinking Saturn's rings are young is that they are bright. The solar system is suffused with comet dust, and comet dust is dark. Leaving Saturn's ring system (which Cassini has shown to be more than 90%90 \% water ice) out in such a mist is like leaving laundry hanging on a line downwind from a smokestack: it will get dirty. The lighter the rings are, the faster this will happen, for the less mass they contain, the less celestial pollution they can absorb before they start to discolour. Jeff Cuzzi, a scientist at America's space agency, NASA, who helped run Cassini, told the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston that combining the mass estimates with Cassini's measurements of the density of comet dust near Saturn suggests the rings are no older than the first dinosaurs, nor younger than the last of them that is, they are somewhere between 200 m200 \mathrm{~m} and 70 m70 \mathrm{~m} years old.

That timing fits well with a theory put forward in 2016, by Matija Cuk of the SETI Institute, in California and his colleagues. They suggest that at around the same time as the rings came into being an old set of moons orbiting Saturn destroyed themselves, and from their remains emerged not only the rings but also the planet's current suite of inner moons Rhea, Dione, Tethys, Enceladus and Mimas.

Dr Cuk and his colleagues used computer simulations of Saturn's moons' orbits as a sort of time machine. Looking at the rate at which tidal friction is causing these orbits to lengthen they extrapolated backwards to find out what those orbits would have looked like in the past. They discovered that about 100 m100 \mathrm{~m} years ago the orbits of two of them, Tethys and Dione, would have interacted in a way that left the planes in which they orbit markedly tilted. But their orbits are untilted. The obvious, if unsettling, conclusion was that this interaction never happened-and thus that at the time when it should have happened, Dione and Tethys were simply not there. They must have come into being later.

Based on information provided in the passage, we can infer that, in addition to water ice, Saturn's rings might also have small
amounts of:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 2

We need to find what else Saturn's rings contain besides water ice.

Step 1: Find what the passage says about Saturn's ring composition

Step 2: Look for clues about other materials that might mix with the ice

Step 3: Check which option matches the evidence


From passage: "The solar system is suffused with comet dust, and comet dust is dark. Leaving Saturn's ring system (which Cassini has shown to be more than 90% water ice) out in such a mist is like leaving laundry hanging on a line downwind from a smokestack: it will get dirty."

From passage: "The lighter the rings are, the faster this will happen, for the less mass they contain, the less celestial pollution they can absorb before they start to discolour."

Thought process: Rings are 90%+ water ice → but they're sitting in space with comet dust everywhere → like laundry getting dirty from smoke → rings collect "comet dust" and "celestial pollution" → this makes them darker over time → so rings must contain these pollutants


🔴 Option 1 → not-in-passage → mentions helium and methane but passage never talks about these gases at all

🟢 Option 2 → correct match → comet dust is directly mentioned, and "celestial pollution" could reasonably include rock particles from space debris

🔴 Option 3 → partial-miss → methane isn't mentioned anywhere, even though rock particles could be inferred

🔴 Option 4 → partial-miss → comet dust is right, but helium appears nowhere in the passage

Key insight: The passage uses the laundry analogy - rings get "dirty" from comet dust and celestial pollution floating in space. Option 2 captures both the explicitly mentioned comet dust and reasonably infers rock particles as part of space pollution.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question